Beyond Imperfect Alternatives with Rulemapping: A Neuro-Symbolic Case Study on Online Hate Speech

In three linesNeuro-symbolic study comparing LLMs constrained by deterministic logic scaffolds (Rulemapping) versus unconstrained prompting for hate speech moderation under German Criminal Code (§130). Rulemapping achieves precision 0.80-0.86 and recall 0.82-0.89 versus 0.34-0.49 with unconstrained prompting, eliminating conflation of moral offense with legal illegality.

Summary generated by Claude — human-verified