Topic

#AI safety

AI safety covers the practices aimed at making AI systems reliable, aligned with human intentions, and free from harmful behaviors. Anthropic, for instance, builds Claude around explicit safety principles and alignment research.

40Articles
5Sources
70Avg. signal
arXiv cs.CL·

Redact or Keep? A Fully Local AI Cascade for Educational Dialogue De-Identification

Local de-identification framework for educational dialogues. Two-stage cascade: union proposer (lightweight encoders + deterministic rules) generates PII candidates, then binary Redact/Keep reviewer uses dialogue context and speaker role. Achieves 0.958 macro F1 on math tutoring transcripts, outperforms commercial API (0.706) and local LLM baseline (0.767), runs on single laptop.

RAGAI safetyPapers
SIG
78
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

Aligning Implied Statements for Implicit Hate Speech Generalizability with Context-Bounded Semi-hard Negative Mining

ImpSH, a triplet-based framework, improves implicit hate speech detection by aligning posts with implied statements and using context-bounded semi-hard negatives. Evaluated on IHC, SBIC, and DynaHate with BERT and HateBERT, it enhances cross-domain performance and provides more stable representations than standard supervised contrastive approaches.

BenchmarksAI safetyPapers
SIG
62
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

SAE Interventions are Unreliable: Post-Intervention Recovery of Suppressed Behavior

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) decompose activations into interpretable features, but this study shows that clamping a 'harmful' feature does not eliminate the behavior—it can recover via other residual pathways. Even with active intervention, 95.8% behavior recovery is achievable in refusal-steering, exposing a gap between feature-level control and behavioral completeness.

AI safetyAlignmentEvals
SIG
78
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

Beyond AHI: An Interpretable Causal-Discovery-Guided Framework for Sleep Recovery in Connected Health

Causal framework for sleep recovery scoring from multimodal polysomnography. Uses DAG learning on two cohorts (MESA n=1540, MrOS n=825) to identify five physiological domains (respiratory burden, hypoxia, fragmentation, architecture, autonomic regulation). Sleep Recovery Score (SRS) achieves 2.5× stronger alignment with perceived recovery than standard AHI.

PapersReasoningEvals
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

AIPatient Arena: EHR-grounded evaluation of large language models in end-to-end clinical consultation workflows

AIPatient Arena evaluates LLMs in multi-turn clinical consultation across 8 competence dimensions using EHR-grounded knowledge graphs. On 437 patients, models excel in questioning (4.43-4.99/5) and ethical conduct (4.38-4.93/5), but fail in diagnostic accuracy (2.63-3.55/5) and information coverage (2.08-3.02/5). Weaknesses include repetitive questioning, omitted medical history, inadequate uncertainty handling.

EvalsReasoningAI safety
SIG
82
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

Memory-Efficient Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Safety-Critical Control in Adversarial Spacecraft Proximity Operations

Comparative study of three recurrent architectures (LSTM, GRU, Mamba) and two algorithms (PPO, SAC) for meta-reinforcement learning applied to input-constrained control barrier functions (ICCBF) in spacecraft proximity operations. Mamba + PPO outperforms other setups in safety, task completion, and fuel savings across cooperative and adversarial scenarios.

Reinforcement learningAI safetyRobotics
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

MODE-RAG: Manifold Outlier Diagnosis and Energy-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation

MODE-RAG is a multi-agent system driven by Variational Free Energy to reduce hallucinations in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It uses Monte Carlo Tree Search, logit perturbations, and specialized agents to route high-risk queries and perform post-hoc factual verification. Authors introduce ModeVent, a challenging subset of MultiVent dataset, to evaluate M-RAG robustness.

RAGMulti-agentVision
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

Probing, Fusion, and Trustworthiness: A Systematic Evaluation of Foundation Model Representations for Multimodal Cancer Analysis

Systematic evaluation of foundation model representations (5 FMs) on computational pathology tasks using whole-slide images and transcriptomic profiles (IH-BC, IH-NSCLC cohorts). Multimodal fusion improves performance when no single modality dominates. Conformal prediction shows true diagnosis remains recoverable in prediction sets for majority of failed predictions.

VisionBenchmarksAI safety
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

CheckMIABench: Firm Foundations For Membership Inference Attacks on Language Models

CheckMIABench introduces a benchmark for principled evaluation of membership inference attacks (MIAs) on language models. Leveraging intermediate checkpoints from open-source models (Pythia, OLMo, 70M–7B parameters), the authors construct reliable testbeds where training data before and after a fixed point share the same distribution. They evaluate six published attacks and release a modular library (pandora_llm).

PapersBenchmarksAI safety
SIG
78
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

DiagFlowBench: Evaluating How Language Models Handle Off-Procedure Inputs in Grounded Diagnostic Dialogue

DiagFlowBench evaluates how language models handle off-procedure inputs in industrial diagnostic dialogue. A dataset of 1,676 multi-turn conversations derived from 50 diagnostic flowcharts reveals models often select a real but contextually inadequate step rather than hallucinate, exposing a vulnerability: plausible but wrong advice grounded in documentation.

BenchmarksEvalsReasoning
SIG
75
HYP
00