Topic

#Vision

Computer vision is the field of AI that enables machines to analyze and interpret images or videos. GPT-4o, for instance, can describe the content of a photo, read printed text, or identify objects within a scene.

40Articles
10Sources
70Avg. signal
arXiv cs.AI·

RTSGameBench: An RTS Benchmark for Strategic Reasoning by Vision-Language Models

RTSGameBench is a benchmark to evaluate strategic reasoning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) using real-time strategy games. Built on Beyond All Reason, it offers multi-scenario evaluations, diagnostic mini-games targeting specific competencies, and a self-evolving generation framework. Current state-of-the-art VLMs fail at multi-agent coordination and complex task scaling.

VisionReasoningMulti-agent
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

ThinkDeception: A Progressive Reinforcement Learning Framework for Interpretable Multimodal Deception Detection

ThinkDeception introduces a progressive reinforcement learning framework for interpretable multimodal deception detection. Using MLLMs, it converts binary classification into explicit reasoning via Chain of Thought. VAC-GRPO with curriculum learning stratified into 4 difficulty tiers achieves SOTA on mainstream benchmarks.

ReasoningReinforcement learningVision
SIG
72
HYP
00
GitHub Trending·

<svg aria-hidden="true" data-component="Octicon" height="16" viewBox="0 0 16 16" version="1.1" width="16" data-view-component="true" class="octicon octicon-repo mr-1 tmp-mr-1 color-fg-muted"> <path d="M2 2.5A2.5 2.5 0 0 1 4.5 0h8.75a.75.75 0 0 1 .75.75v12.5a.75.75 0 0 1-.75.75h-2.5a.75.75 0 0 1 0-1.5h1.75v-2h-8a1 1 0 0 0-.714 1.7.75.75 0 1 1-1.072 1.05A2.495 2.495 0 0 1 2 11.5Zm10.5-1h-8a1 1 0 0 0-1 1v6.708A2.486 2.486 0 0 1 4.5 9h8ZM5 12.25a.25.25 0 0 1 .25-.25h3.5a.25.25 0 0 1 .25.25v3.25a.25.25 0 0 1-.4.2l-1.45-1.087a.249.249 0 0 0-.3 0L5.4 15.7a.25.25 0 0 1-.4-.2Z"></path> </svg> <span data-view-component="true" class="text-normal"> bytedance /</span> UI-TARS-desktop

ByteDance releases UI-TARS-desktop, an open-source multimodal AI agent stack. The project connects cutting-edge AI models and agent infrastructure to automate UI-based tasks.

AI AgentsMulti-agentOpen source
SIG
65
HYP
00
GitHub Trending·

<svg aria-hidden="true" data-component="Octicon" height="16" viewBox="0 0 16 16" version="1.1" width="16" data-view-component="true" class="octicon octicon-repo mr-1 tmp-mr-1 color-fg-muted"> <path d="M2 2.5A2.5 2.5 0 0 1 4.5 0h8.75a.75.75 0 0 1 .75.75v12.5a.75.75 0 0 1-.75.75h-2.5a.75.75 0 0 1 0-1.5h1.75v-2h-8a1 1 0 0 0-.714 1.7.75.75 0 1 1-1.072 1.05A2.495 2.495 0 0 1 2 11.5Zm10.5-1h-8a1 1 0 0 0-1 1v6.708A2.486 2.486 0 0 1 4.5 9h8ZM5 12.25a.25.25 0 0 1 .25-.25h3.5a.25.25 0 0 1 .25.25v3.25a.25.25 0 0 1-.4.2l-1.45-1.087a.249.249 0 0 0-.3 0L5.4 15.7a.25.25 0 0 1-.4-.2Z"></path> </svg> <span data-view-component="true" class="text-normal"> bytedance /</span> UI-TARS-desktop

ByteDance releases UI-TARS-desktop, an open-source multimodal AI agent stack connecting cutting-edge AI models and agent infrastructure. Platform for building agents capable of interacting with user interfaces.

AI AgentsMulti-agentOpen source
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

Evaluating Large Language Models Abilities for Addressee, Turn-change, and Next Speaker Prediction in Meetings

Comparative study of LLM abilities to predict next speaker, turn changes, and addressee in multi-party conversations. On the AMI corpus, LLMs outperform supervised models and humans in next speaker prediction without audio-visual access. MM-LLMs exceed text-based LLMs but remain below human performance for addressee and turn-change prediction.

BenchmarksEvalsVision
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

FllumaOne: A Code-Native Multimodal CAD Dataset with Executable Programs and Kernel-Validated Feature Histories

FllumaOne is a multimodal CAD dataset of 100,000 models generated by executable Python programs in Flluma (OpenCASCADE-based CAD system). Each sample aligns the program with a feature tree, STEP representation, point cloud, and natural-language descriptions. A Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B baseline achieves 99.98% Python syntax validity and 99.14% STEP-export validity.

Code generationBenchmarksVision
SIG
82
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

LongWebBench: Evaluating Structural and Functional Webpage Generation in Long-Horizon Settings

LongWebBench is a benchmark evaluating long-horizon webpage generation by vision-language models. It contains 490 real-world pages for structural evaluation and 507 goal-oriented interaction tasks over 129 pages. Experiments show structural fidelity degrades with webpage length, and visually plausible generations often fail to support multi-step executable interactions.

VisionBenchmarksAI Agents
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

Revisiting LLM Adaptation for 3D CT Report Generation: A Study of Scaling and Diagnostic Priors

Study of LLM adaptation for 3D CT report generation in medical imaging. RAD3D-Prefix, a lightweight diagnostic-prior framework, integrates image embeddings and multi-label classification logits. Across LLMs from 96.1M to 1.6B parameters, freezing the model and training only projection layers outperforms full fine-tuning, reducing clinical hallucination and overfitting.

Fine-tuningVision
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

MODE-RAG: Manifold Outlier Diagnosis and Energy-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation

MODE-RAG is a multi-agent system driven by Variational Free Energy to reduce hallucinations in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It uses Monte Carlo Tree Search, logit perturbations, and specialized agents to route high-risk queries and perform post-hoc factual verification. Authors introduce ModeVent, a challenging subset of MultiVent dataset, to evaluate M-RAG robustness.

RAGMulti-agentVision
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

Probing, Fusion, and Trustworthiness: A Systematic Evaluation of Foundation Model Representations for Multimodal Cancer Analysis

Systematic evaluation of foundation model representations (5 FMs) on computational pathology tasks using whole-slide images and transcriptomic profiles (IH-BC, IH-NSCLC cohorts). Multimodal fusion improves performance when no single modality dominates. Conformal prediction shows true diagnosis remains recoverable in prediction sets for majority of failed predictions.

VisionBenchmarksAI safety
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

MathVis-Fine: Aligning Visual Supervision with Necessity via Progressive Dependency-Guided Training for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning

MathVis-Fine introduces a framework for fine-grained visual dependency modeling in mathematical reasoning. A new dataset augments visual annotations with visual dependency ratings. Two-stage progressive training balances answer correctness and visual grounding rewards according to each sample's intrinsic visual necessity, reducing reward bias.

ReasoningVisionBenchmarks
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.CL·

Can Agents Read the Room? Benchmarking Visual Social Intelligence in Multimodal Simulation

AgentViSS benchmark evaluates visual social intelligence of multimodal agents in social simulations. 240 scenarios, 585 roles, 2,340 instances test whether MLLMs use visual cues (expressions, posture, gaze) to guide interactions. Seven models evaluated show gap: expression and conflict handling near saturation, interaction regulation and visually grounded outcomes remain substantially harder.

BenchmarksVisionAI Agents
SIG
75
HYP
00
arXiv cs.LG·

Unlocking Latent Dimensions: Exploring Representations of Large-Scale X-ray Scattering Data using Variational Autoencoders

Variational Autoencoder (C-VAE) trained on 1.5 million X-ray scattering images to learn low-dimensional representations. Model reveals organized clusters and generates controlled synthetic images. Deployed without retraining across two synchrotron facilities, outperforms DINOv3 in interpretability. Integrated into Latent Space Explorer (MLExchange).

VisionBenchmarksTools
SIG
72
HYP
00
arXiv cs.AI·

Fusion is not one-size-fits-all: Cross-Modal Representation Alignment for Time-to-Event Modeling

Multimodal fusion framework for time-to-event prediction (PE mortality, CVD outcomes) aligning CT and longitudinal EHR representations using foundation models. Four strategies tested (late fusion, contrastive alignment, cross-attention, co-attention) on 3,099–2,951 patients. Contrastive fusion improves concordance index by 1.5–5.4% vs unimodal baselines.

BenchmarksEmbeddingsVision
SIG
72
HYP
00