Vision-capable LLMs vs. OCR for long-document (including charts, images, tables, etc.) QA
Signal
72
Hype
25
In three linesBenchmark on 30 long PDFs (171 questions) comparing vision LLMs vs OCR for document QA. Claude Sonnet 4.5 native PDF: 52% accuracy, $0.2552/query (5th/6). LlamaCloud premium + OCR: 59.6%, $0.1885/query. Vision underperforms on charts/tables; premium OCR more robust. Vision LLM has 7% intrinsic failure rate vs 0% for OCR after retry.Read source
Your take?
Summary generated by Claude — human-verified