Page 16 of 192

AllHigh signalRecent
7679 articles
arXiv cs.LG·

Are we really tilting? The mechanics of reward guidance in flow and diffusion models

Reward guidance algorithms steer generative processes toward reward-tilted measures. The paper shows reward hacking stems from finite-particle plug-in estimation of the Doob h-function in practical implementations. Authors propose a closed-form reward damping schedule and validate on Gaussian targets, 2D checkerboard, and FLUX.1 text-to-image generation.

Reinforcement learningReasoningPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.CL·

Predicting Inference-Time Scaling Gains from Labeled Validation-Set Output Statistics

Method to predict best-of-N inference scaling gains without running the full procedure. Ridge predictor identifies 3 stable features (prompt-level agreement spread, label-assisted first-correct-sample position, completion-length variance) plus entropy, reaching Spearman ρ=0.90 correlation with actual gains across model families and math/reasoning tasks.

ReasoningEvalsReinforcement learning
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.LG·

RESCAST-100K: A Comprehensive Dataset for Cross-Domain Residential Load and Indoor Temperature Forecasting

RESCAST-100K is a benchmark of 100,000 U.S. homes simulated via EnergyPlus/ResStock for evaluating cross-domain generalization in residential energy load and indoor temperature forecasting. 15-minute time series dataset with 40+ static building covariates, integrating 5 real-world datasets. Cross-attention and MLP-mixer models outperform classical transformers under domain shift.

BenchmarksFine-tuningPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
Reddit r/MachineLearning·

Backpropagation destroys V1 brain alignment in one epoch, tracking RSA alignment to fMRI across training for BP, FA, predictive coding, and STDP [R]

Comparative study of learning rules (backprop, feedback alignment, predictive coding, STDP) via RSA alignment with human V1 fMRI. Backprop destroys 90% of V1 alignment after 1 epoch (r: 0.102→0.011), while PC and STDP lose only 25-31%. At epoch 40: PC/STDP >> BP/FA. Suggests fundamental trade-off between global error signals (higher layers) and early-layer alignment.

AlignmentBenchmarksPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
Reddit r/MachineLearning·

LLM agents patch security bugs, pass all tests, but still leave the vulnerability open [R]

CVE-Bench evaluates 5 frontier models on 20 real-world CVEs (Pillow, GitPython, urllib3, etc.) across 300 runs. Max solve rate 50% (60% under advisory). Agents patch syntactically but leave vulnerabilities open. Significant cross-family gaps (OpenAI vs Laguna, p<0.05), within-family noise. Failure modes: wrong-search drift, hallucinations, context loss.

AI AgentsBenchmarksAI safety
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.LG·

Quantized Reasoning Models Think They Need to Think Longer, but They Do Not

Post-training quantization (PTQ) reduces reasoning model accuracy and increases chain-of-thought length. 52% of failures involve correct intermediate answers not output as final answers. A training-free logit penalty on overthinking markers ("wait", "but", "alternatively") reduces CoT length by 12-23% while preserving accuracy across 5 models (1.5B-32B) and 5 benchmarks.

ReasoningFine-tuningBenchmarks
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

Capability Self-Assessment: Teaching LLMs to Know Their Limits

Modern LLMs systematically overestimate their competence and attempt unsolvable queries. Researchers propose Capability Self-Assessment (CSA), formulated as a policy-learning problem using reinforcement learning, to teach models to recognize their limits. RL significantly outperforms supervised fine-tuning, preserves original capabilities, and generalizes out-of-distribution.

Reinforcement learningAlignmentEvals
SIG
78
HYP
22
arXiv cs.CL·

Which Institutional Frameworks Do Chatbots Assume? Auditing Jurisdictional Defaults in Multilingual LLMs

Audit of 7 LLMs (US/China) on 2,520 responses to 60 legal-administrative prompts in English and Mandarin. Models default to the institutional framework of input language: 74.5% of English responses adopt US framework, 53.3% of Chinese responses adopt China framework. Risk of jurisdictional misselection when preferred language differs from applicable jurisdiction.

BenchmarksAI safetyRegulation
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.CL·

Graph-Augmented Retrieval for Cross-Entity Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study

Comparative study of a two-hop Graph-RAG architecture versus standard vector-only RAG for cross-entity financial sentiment analysis. On 100 queries (30 direct, 70 relational), Graph-RAG improves entity recall (+6.4%, p<0.001) and answer relevancy for complex queries (+11.7%), with no quality degradation, modest 22.6% latency increase but 80% variance reduction.

RAGBenchmarksPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.LG·

RAFT: Data Refinement and Adaptive Distillation for Domain Fine-Tuning with Alleviated Forgetting

RAFT is a two-stage domain fine-tuning method that mitigates catastrophic forgetting. It refines data via self-conditioned rewriting and answer fusion, then applies on-policy distillation where the original model provides soft targets on student-generated trajectories. Across five domains, RAFT improves domain accuracy by 23.2% over standard SFT and recovers 18.2% of degradation on MS-Bench.

Fine-tuningReinforcement learningPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

Threshold-Based Exclusive Batching for LLM Inference

arXiv paper on LLM inference batching optimization. Authors demonstrate mixed batching (MB) is suboptimal on bandwidth-constrained GPUs: exclusive batching (EB) achieves 41.9% higher throughput on RTX PRO 6000 (1.792 TB/s). They propose EB+, a hybrid scheduler that dynamically switches between EB and MB based on GPU bandwidth, model size, and workload composition, reaching 36.4% gains under non-stationary traffic.

InfrastructureBenchmarksPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

TAPS: Target-Aware Prefix Tree Selection for Diffusion-Drafted Speculative Decoding

TAPS introduces a target-aware prefix selection method for diffusion-drafted speculative decoding. By converting diffusion marginals into path-conditioned acceptance estimates, TAPS selects a compact prefix-closed subtree under fixed verification budget. Results: 7.9x lossless speedup vs vanilla autoregressive decoding, 1.36x and 1.74x over DFlash and DDTree.

Code generationReasoningBenchmarks
SIG
78
HYP
15