Page 29 of 192

AllHigh signalRecent
7679 articles
arXiv cs.CL·

SD-Search: On-Policy Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search-Augmented Reasoning

SD-Search introduces on-policy hindsight self-distillation for search-augmented reasoning agents. A single model acts as both student (inference-time context only) and teacher (conditioned on search outcomes from rollout groups). Step-level supervision via Jensen-Shannon divergence at query positions, integrated into GRPO training without external models or annotations.

ReasoningReinforcement learningAI Agents
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

LARGER: Lexically Anchored Repository Graph Exploration and Retrieval

LARGER is a context retrieval framework for repository-level coding agents combining lexical search with structural graph exploration (imports, call chains, type hierarchies) without external databases. On LocBench, it improves file-level Acc@5 by +13.9 points (or +11.8 with fixed hyperparameters) and shows consistent gains on test generation and codebase QA benchmarks.

AI AgentsCode generationBenchmarks
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.CL·

Scale Determines Whether Language Models Organize Representation Geometry for Prediction

Study on how representation geometry organization in language models depends on scale. Subspace PGA metric tests alignment of intermediate geometry with unembedding matrix readout. Small models (≤1024) progressively lose organization at late layers during training, while large models (≥2048) preserve it throughout. Scale determines how geometry organizes for prediction.

PapersReasoningEvals
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

Breaking $\textit{Winner-Takes-All}$: Cooperative Policy Optimization Improves Diverse LLM Reasoning

GCPO (Group Cooperative Policy Optimization) replaces competitive rollout optimization with team-level credit assignment. Rollouts are rewarded by contribution to valid solution coverage (determinant volume over semantic embeddings), not individual accuracy. Results: improved reasoning accuracy and solution diversity across benchmarks.

Reinforcement learningReasoningBenchmarks
SIG
78
HYP
25
arXiv cs.CL·

Temporal Decay of Co-Citation Predictability: A 20-Year Statute Retrieval Benchmark from 396M Ukrainian Court Citations

UA-StatuteRetrieval: 20-year benchmark on 396M Ukrainian court citations. Co-citation predictability declines 33-47% (Adamic-Adar MRR 0.43→0.29). Non-uniform decay: criminal law stable (~0.40), civil law collapses (0.35→0.15) post-2017 reform. Mid-frequency articles (1K-10K citations) lose 50% predictability. E5-large detects 4.3% semantic drift.

BenchmarksEmbeddingsRAG
SIG
78
HYP
15
arXiv cs.AI·

Learning Reasoning Rewards from Expert Demonstrations with Inverse Reinforcement Learning

R-AIRL (Reasoning Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning) infers process-level reward functions from expert Chain-of-Thoughts without explicit reward definitions. Tested on GSM8K, MMLU-Pro, and MedReason: improves pass@1 by 17.4 points via inference-time reranking, outperforms SFT in post-training, localizes reasoning failures with 86.1% accuracy.

Reinforcement learningReasoningEvals
SIG
78
HYP
25
arXiv cs.AI·

Beyond Policy Optimization: A Data Curation Flywheel for Sparse-Reward Long-Horizon Planning

BPO, a three-stage framework (bootstrapping, extrapolation, refinement), creates a self-improving data flywheel to train robust reasoning models for long-horizon sparse-reward planning. Uses planning quaternions, long-short chain-of-thought fusion, and complexity-stratified curriculum learning. SOTA on ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, WebShop with significant token efficiency.

ReasoningAI AgentsReinforcement learning
SIG
78
HYP
25
arXiv cs.CL·

Protection Is (Nearly) All You Need: Structural Protection Dominates Scoring in Globally Capped KV Eviction

Study of KV cache eviction policies (LRU, H2O, SnapKV, StreamingLLM, Ada-KV, QUEST, Random) under global cap. Without structural boundary protection, all collapse to F1≤0.064. Reserving 10% cache at each boundary recovers 69–90% quality on LongBench at C=256 (13% retention). Position-0 holds ~75% attention mass; protecting structurally critical tokens dominates over scoring differences.

ReasoningBenchmarksPapers
SIG
78
HYP
15